Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steersman's avatar

> "... In no other situation do we require a person to sacrifice their body or health ..."

What about men being drafted into the army, being obliged to risk life and limb? For the greater glory of man and Gawd and the "Amurican way of life"? 😉🙂

Not to say that I fully reject a woman's right to abortion. Just that one might reasonably say that, in many if not most cases, she's in that position because of her irresponsible behavior, and that it's not up to the rest of society to pay all of the freight to rectify the consequences, that she should be obliged to pick up a major portion of the damages -- financially or healthwise.

En passant, I kind of object to the Pew Research survey using the word "gender" to tabulate their results. At best, all that "gender" means is a range, a spectrum of sexually dimorphic personality and behavioural traits -- are they tabulating results by who are introverts and extroverts, by who's more feminine or masculine?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gender#usage-1

As Francis Bacon put it, "therefore shoddy and inept uses of words lay siege to the intellect in wondrous ways".

Expand full comment
Person Online's avatar

>In no other situation do we require a person to sacrifice their body or health for the life of another, even when they’re responsible for that other person existing and/or being in danger.<

Of course we do. Do you think being a parent stops having any costs associated with it the moment that the birth canal is passed? We expect parents to continue sacrificing in every aspect of their life for the sake of their children for 18 years, yet for some reason we do not allow people to kill their offspring in order to back out of this arrangement after the magical passage through the birth canal has occurred. Only before.

Expand full comment
63 more comments...