Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Malmesbury's avatar

There's another edge case: what if the fetus mom wants to keep the baby, the fetus dad wants to abort, and technologies for abortion are vanishingly non-invasive (like, swallowing an idealized abortion pill with no side effect)? Should the father be able to mandate an abortion?

On a moral ground I'm not sure - there's some value to the your-body-your-choice doctrine, although we do give pills to people without consent already so exceptions may sometimes be ok. On a pragmatic ground, I'm pretty sure a world where fathers can request early abortions (assuming the idealized tech above) is a better world, if anything because growing up without a father appears to be harmful to the child and to society. Maybe some fathers also attribute some sacred value to parenthood or genetic material and may just not want to have a child if they don't want to, regardless of rearing or alimony. In these cases, it's not clear why these "sacred values" should be less worthy of respect than the "sacred value" of people not taking a pill if they don't want to. What do you think?

(To be really clear, I don't know what current abortion tech feels like, but I think there's a threshold of invasiveness below which the dad should have the right to request an abortion. Whether there will ever be a technology that goes below the threshold is another question!)

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts